DIVORCE

RULING IN THE NAME OF UKRAINE

ХХ June 20ХХ Kharkov city

ХХХХ District court of Kharkov city in the composition:

Chairperson – judge ХХХХХХХХХ,

Clerk to justices ХХХХХХХХХХ,

Having considered in open court in Kharkov city civil case based on the suit of Mr. ХХХХХХХХХХХХХХХХХХХХХХ against Ms. ХХХХХХХХХХХХХХХХХХХХХХХ claiming marriage dissolution,

HAS ESTABLISHED:

The plaintiff applied to the court with a suit claiming dissolution of marriage with the defendant, stating that the family was disrupted.

In the court session the plaintiff’s representative supported the suit and explained, that the reason of plaintiff’s family disruption was lack of understanding, different approach to life, lack of compatibility between the spouses. In the result of described relations between the spouses the love and respect towards each other were lost. A few years ago the plaintiff returned back to homeland, and since then has not been living with the defendant.

The defendant failed to appear before the court...

SENTENCIA En nombre de Ucrania

El XX de junio de 20XX Ciudad de Kharkiv

El juzgado del distrito XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX de la ciudad de Kharkiv compuesto de:

Presidente Juez XXXXXXXXXXXX

Con el secretario XXXXXXXXXXXX

después de haber examinado en la audiencia pública en la ciudad de Kharkiv la causa civil a demanda de XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX contra XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX sobre la disolución de matrimonio

HIZO CONSTAR

El demandante se dirigió al Juzgado con la demanda presente, pidiendo disolver el matrimonio con la demandada, porque su familia se había desintegrado.

En la audiencia el representante del demandante apoya la demanda y explica que la causa de la desintegración de la familia es la falta de la comprensión recíproca, la diversidad de los puntos de vista sobre la vida, la incompatibilidad de los caracteres. Ya hace unos años el demandante se fue de la familia y desde aquel momento no viven juntos.

La demandada no compareció en la ...

JUDGEMENT IN THE NAME OF THE UKRAINE

Coat of arms of Ukraine

November XX, 20XX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX District Court of Odessa city in the composition of:

Chairperson – Judge XXXXXXXXXXX

With clerk of the court – XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Having considered in the court session in Odessa city the civil case based on the suit of Ms. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX against Mr. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX on dissolution of marriage,

HAS ESTABLISHED:

The Plaintiff applied to the court with a suit claiming to dissolve the marriage between her and the Defendant Mr. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX.

The Defendant admitted the suit before the court and agreed to dissolution of marriage.

Having heard the representative of the plaintiff, the defendant, having examined the case papers, the court has concluded that the suit is subject to satisfaction due to the following circumstances.

As it has been established in the court hearing Mr. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX and Ms. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX have been officially married since February XX, 19XX. In the wedlo...

Divorce Judgement

JUDGMENT

IN THE NAME OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

March XX, 2009 Moscow city

Justice of the Peace of court district No. XXX of Sokolniki District of Moscow city Ms. XXXXXXXXXXXX, temporary acting as the Justice of the Peace of court district No. XXX of Preobrazhensky District of Moscow, with Clerk to justices Ms. XXXXXXXXXXXX,

Having considered in open court session the civil case based on the suit of Mr. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX against Ms. XXXXXXXXXXXXX claiming marriage dissolution,

HAS ESTABLISHED:

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX applied to the court with a suit against XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX claiming dissolution of marriage. Substantiating the declared claim he stated that has been married to the defendant since August XX, 20XX. They have no children in the wedlock. Cohabitation with the defendant has failed. Marital relations between the parties were stopped more than six months ago, they do not have common household. Further cohabitation of retaining of the family is impossible. T...

RULING

On April XX, 20XX the XXXXXXXXXXXXX District Court of Saint Petersburg in the composition of chairperson judge Ms. XXXXXXXXXX

With participation of attorneys at law Ms. XXXXXXXXXXX, Ms. Karina Krasnova, Clerk to the justices Ms. XXXXXXXXXXXXXX,

Having considered in open court session the civil case based on the suit of Mr. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX against XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX claiming determination of the procedure for meeting with the child,

HAS ESTABLISHED:

The parties have been officially married since January XX, 19XX, in the wedlock they have daughter XXXXXXX born on May XX, 19XX.

The plaintiff applied to the court with the suit claiming dissolution of marriage, he agrees to the child’s place of residence to be the place of residence of her mother, to the size of alimony and procedure for child’s support, agrees to divide the jointly acquired property, and to define the procedure for meeting with the child.

In the course of proceedings it has been established that t...